Skip to content

chore: bump example Expo for CI compatibility - #14

Merged
mikehardy merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
invertase/expo-deps-bump-fcfb
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

mikehardy merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
invertase/expo-deps-bump-fcfb

Conversation

@alexdukeinvertase

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Mike: this is shared example-app Expo drift on main — CI’s expo install --check rejects expo@57.0.25 vs expected ~57.0.31. It blocks docs/README PRs the same way; it’s not a docs content issue.

What changed

  • Bumped the example workspace Expo range so WAIT_FOR_CI_SELF_TEST / wait-for-ci.sh Expo gate can pass.
  • Refreshed the Yarn lockfile for that bump only.
Path Change Why
example/package.json expo ~57.0.25 → ~57.0.31 Match Expo SDK 57 expected range for expo install --check
yarn.lock Resolved expo@57.0.31 (+ related Expo tooling) Lock the compatible install for CI

Test plan / results

  • yarn workspace react-native-coverage-example exec expo install --check → exit 0 (Dependencies are up to date)
  • CI unit job (incl. wait-for-ci Expo check) green on this PR

Align example expo with SDK 57 expected range so WAIT_FOR_CI_SELF_TEST
expo install --check passes on shared main tree.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.54%. Comparing base (88c94ed) to head (2edf96e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main      #14   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     59.54%   59.54%           
  Complexity       15       15           
=========================================
  Files            22       22           
  Lines          1048     1048           
  Branches        239      239           
=========================================
  Hits            624      624           
  Misses          352      352           
  Partials         72       72           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e-android 81.70% <ø> (ø)
e2e-ios-dynamic 90.62% <ø> (ø)
e2e-ios-static 63.07% <ø> (ø)
unit-js 54.08% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@alexdukeinvertase
alexdukeinvertase marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2026 09:20

@mikehardy mikehardy left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice one, thanks

@mikehardy
mikehardy merged commit 75c98ef into main Oct 22, 2026
10 checks passed
@mikehardy
mikehardy deleted the invertase/expo-deps-bump-fcfb branch October 22, 2026 17:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants